http://drexel.edu/excite/research/shimaSeiki/
Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer
And see Simondon, Maturana, Guattari, MP for richer views.
for 20 years since sponge, my fellow artists and i measured our work not to “new media” or anything to do with “computation” or "interaction” but to the most highly evolved and richest arts: theater, architecture, plastic arts, visual arts…
we aspire to make experiences as powerful as that which were achieved by the likes of Bertoldt Brecht, Sankai Juku, Dumb Type, or Anish Kapoor, Mona Hartoum, Renzo Piano, …
by such standards very very few works of computational media art “measure up” in experiential and conceptual power. but that should impel us to do more. certainly that should prevent us from lapsing into the complacency typical of programmers who discover the pleasure of mapping an input into a color or a frequency, and stop there.
ever since i established the Topological Media Lab in at GaTech, i said we do not do “interactive” stuff. and when i accepted the Canada Research Chair in “new media” i said there is no such thing as new media :)
À propos de Laetitia Sonami
(Oakland, États-Unis)
Né en France, Laetitia Sonami est installée aux États-Unis depuis 1975 où elle poursuit son travail en musique électronique. Elle réunit la technologie de pointe, la musique et la narration pour en extraire des récits intimes, une forme d'art spontané qui lui est propre. Elle est surtout connue pour son instrument original, le Ladys Glove. Ses performances des dernières années lui ont valu une renommée internationale. Depuis 1996, elle a été invitée dans plusieurs festivals internationaux et a fait des prestations dans les grandes capitales culturelles du monde. Son travail a été récompensé par de nombreux prix. En janvier 1997, le New York Times décrit Sonami comme « a human antenna searching the air for sounds, like a dancer focused on her hands, or like a deity summoning earth-shaking rumbles with a brusque gesture. »
The artist - and more generally aesthetic perception - detaches and deterritorializes a segment of the real in such a way as to make it play the role of a partial enunciator. Art confers a function of sense and alterity to a subset of the perceived world. The consequence of this quasi-animistic speech effect of a work of art is that the subjectivity of the artist and the “consumer” is reshaped. …. The work of art, for those who use it, is an activity of unframing, of rupturing sense, of baroque proliferation or extreme impoverishment, which leads to a recreation and a reinvention of the subject itself.
Felix Guattari, Chaosmosis 131
On Feb 29, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Brenda McCaffrey <brendamc@asu.edu> wrote:Hi Xin Wei,This is ravishing. Thank you.Hmmm...how do you think our experience of gravity affects our musicality?-BrendaOn Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Xin Wei Sha <Xinwei.Sha@asu.edu> wrote:Dear AME 531 Seminarians,Thanks again to Dr. Garth Paine for a lovely set of exercises and ear- and mind-opening musical examples. (I’ve asked for the names of composers and works.)Let me offer a followup to the discussion we had…(1) Re. “traditional” music.The appeal to “traditional” music for different ancient cultures does not distinguish any universals about what is tuneful or rhythmic or “catchy” or musical:Mongolian Tuva throat singingSainkho Naimtchuk, one of the most extraordinary singers in the worldSainkho Namtchylak - Order To Survive (Germany 2002)thenAnd some example of “traditional” music:Khoomii singing(2) Metrically regular beat-based music versus other kinds of music — e.g. melismatic songTalking about tapping toes to a metrically regular beat. This is an artifact of very very recent invention — of electrical mechanical devices. The notion of metronomic performance is very recent in human history:Bonus, Alexander Evan. The Metronomic Performance Practice: A History of Rhythm, Metronomes, and the Mechanization of Musicality. PhD Dissertation, Case Western Reserve Univ., 2010.If humans have vocalized and sung for say 5000+ years, then the notion of (mechanically periodic) beat occupies a pretty trivial portion of that time. Beat-oriented music is of course quite common and widespread — even Sainkho Namtchylak sings songs with periodicity. However as you can hear, she also sings music that is clearly musical, even passionately musical, but whose power and appeal is not based on beat. This is not new, but ancient.Gregorian Chant is a glorious example of music that is melismatic, rather than beat-based. Gregorian Chant ebbs and flows, rises and falls with the intertwining of both the patterns of closed and open vocalisation of Latin speech and the inhalation and exhalation of breath which varies in length and intensity with the sweeps of meaning, syllabification, closing / opening of the nasal, vocal, lung cavities, the stresses of the poetry, all of which lead to a gentle irregularity.Singing, like bowed stringed musical instruments, is characterized continuous flow, breath, but not beat.One of the most ravishing songs of the past 1500 years is the opening of the Gregorian Pentecost Mass:Gregorian Chant: Dominica Pentecostes: I. Introitus (Spiritus Domini)(Domenica di Pentecoste, Introito VIII modo, Schola Gregoriana Mediolanensis, Giovanni Vianini, Milano, Italia)()(3) Also, even when the music clearly has temporal accent and pulse, it may not be “catchy” to your ear. Appealing to “traditional” music won’t guarantee “catchiness-to-your-ear.” I would hazard that to ears habituated to American popular music from the past 10-30 years, especially post iTunes, traditional Kabuki music may not be so catchy:Azuma Kabuki Musicians Nagauta MusicAnd then it may – à chacun son goût (“to each his own taste”). And therein lies the rub. : musicality is as much a question of the putative subject (the listening “you”) as it is of object (sound waves, pieces of flesh pressing on pieces of wood or metal at specific times ), and the social-cultural context. ( Social-cultural-geological-cosmological context, if we read farther into Deleuze & Guattari, Simondon, Whitehead. ) Garth’s exercise introduces this subjectification by having one human be the “sensor” for the other.(4)In a sense, this whole year-long seminar is devoted to opening up to the universe of pattern available to us when we sail farther from the shores of habits inherited from combinatoric or mechanical, or graph-theoretic tropes that have become frozen in by the reductive and simplistic forms of late 20c computationalism.A grand challenge for those of us who are doing research — adding to the sum of human knowledge using the technologies of our age, which are shot through and through with computational logic — is whether and how we can articulate media = matter + energy + affect with more poetry, nuance, breath.Rather than reducing music (organized sound) and musical performance to formal computationally popularized patterns, what can we learn from organized sound and (live) performance to inform a more expanded notions of pattern, computation, articulation, language, representation … ?Xin Wei