RE: working ethos and models for Synthesis, references for "creativity" | "imagination" | "speculative media(ion)"

by Adam Nocek
Thanks for this, Xin Wei. The LCT is indeed a friend to all of this this! 

My initial thoughts:

Practically: 

1. I think one way to start this conversation would be to sketch out concrete ways in which individuals (from inside and outside ASU) are able to collaborate with Synthesis. The LCT took a crack at this with it's "micro-residency" program. I think SC and LCT should find ways to coordinate some of its micro-residencies. 

2. Pop-up MAs: LCT and Synthesis should direct rotating, theme-based MAs on critical and experimental practice. I don't know how this would work administratively --maybe it's a "stream" within DC? In any case, students would spend 2 yrs working through a "problem" with the goal of developing some experimental concepts. These problems would also fit in with--and significantly transform--ASUs innovation/problem-solution mission, etc. Example problems: "Excess and Scarcity," "Gestural Economies," "Non-anthropocentric Design," "Nonhuman Performativity."

Of course we can and should apply for a grant to do this, but couldn't we prototype some version of this via some good old fashion labor of love? Let's be scrappy :) We'd also demonstrate proof of product for future grants. 

As an SC-LCT joint venture, we'd be carving out an incredibly unique and robust way for critical and experimental collaboration through education and mentorship.

The pop-up MA would also feed SC-LCT micro-residencies: we attract visiting scholars/professors based on the theme. 

There is a precedent for this kind of thing in Amsterdam @ The Sandberg Institute (a part of the world-famous Gerrit Rietveld Academie): http://sandberg.nl/  (see: Temporary Programs)

One draw for students would be attending the Paris Design Workshop that Xin Wei and I will be teaching at this summer and in future years. We could build it into the program. This is what Barbara Formis and I have been chatting about! 

Thoughts?


A.J. Nocek, PhD
Assistant Professor, Philosophy of Technology and Science and Technology Studies
Director, Laboratory for Critical Technics (LCT)
School of Arts, Media + Engineering
Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts
Arizona State University
206.434.7637
 


From: sxw asu [sxwasu@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 8:22 AM
To: Christopher Roberts; Brandon Mechtley; Todd Ingalls; Adam Nocek; Julian Stein
Cc: Posthaven Post By Email
Subject: working ethos and models for Synthesis, references for "creativity" | "imagination" | "speculative media(ion)"

Here are some docs describing how I’m trying to build Synthesis, learning from experiences of the TML, and distilled from reflections on the contemporary and recent political economy of lab-based science, studio-based art, empirical work in the technosciences, critical history of the human “sciences” as well as the rich and vital anarchist life of creative play outside the academy.

A core place to start would be notions of process, individuation, life.  There are many ways to think-do-make this, but for me and a lot of the the ecologies of friendships and practices in which Synthesis and TML has flourished, here’s some convenient reference literature:
Daodejing (DC Lau translation), 
Zhuangzi (Burton Watson translation),
Heraclitus (Kahn translation), 
Spinoza, 
Deleuze, 
Deleuze and Guattari, 
Whitehead.

Adam is a friend to this and is firing up LCT and “speculative media(ion)” as good companion projects.   I would like to invite Adam and Todd to be part of Chris Roberts and Brandon’s conversation about how Synthesis can be described in popular terms as a home for “creative practice.”    More precise terms of art include speculative practice and experimental practice (as in the Brill book series), and the problem (in Deleuze, Bachelard senses, see Patrice Maniglier essay)

Where appropriate, I’d like to complement energy, capacities and pool resources for streams or experiments of common interest.